Project Area A
Ritual Dynamics Between
Tradition and Recent Religious Practice
Synopsis
The
symbolic significance of rituals in the representation and manifestation of
cultural tradition is indisputable and frequently documented. However, for a
long time, the primarily theoretical interest in the "expressive character" of
rituals has led to a neglect of the detailed analysis of the ritual actions. It
was not only the deeper insight into the competence and significance of rituals
borne by the performative media and the performing agents that fell short. We
also know very little about their transformative role in contexts marked by
political alterations, religious pluralisms and cultural changes.
The
research projects subsumed under project area A can rightfully claim to be
countering these shortcomings of the former research on ritual. The potential
for gaining cross-project insights is especially high, since the subprojects,
although featuring different circumstances and theoretical approaches, are coalescing
in their research on action-specific aspects. This prompts us to expect
differentiated yet comparable statements about the change of rituals as well as
their impetus for change.
Subproject
A1 investigates the dynamics and effectiveness that rituals provide for the
staging and transformation of socio-cultural identity. The case studies based
in Taiwan and Morocco go beyond their specific contexts, insofar as their
targeted research on performative effectiveness (relevant for all other
subprojects) treats the following aspects:
·
transfer
and appropriation of rituals (see A2 and A4),
·
ritual
negotiation of regional, ethnical, nation-state identities (see A2 and A4),
·
ritual
constitution of social authority (see A4), and
·
performative
media (see A4).
All these
aspects show specific contact points with other projects.
In a
similar manner, subprojects A2 and A3 do not only specify forms of ritual
proceduralization and diversification of normative traditions in Hinduism and
Buddhism in Nepal and South India (lead by either local, folk-religious or
"modern" modifications or by intra- or interreligious transfer). It is rather
the specifically examined issues of "the relation of script and performance",
the "change of ritual in the context of modernity", the "tension between high
and folk traditions" (see A1 and A4) as well as the "various religious
traditions" (see A3) and the relation between "ritual and acculturation" (see
A4) that mark the specific options for connection with the other subprojects.
Finally,
subproject A4 reaches beyond our regional North-Indian case studies with its
analysis of the constitution of social agency through ritual manipulation of
the concepts of territoriality.
On the one
side, the investigation of the "complexity and distribution of competences to
act in rituals" and on the other side, the theme of "ritually constituted
places and territories", located between cosmological (see A3 and A2) and
political (see A2 and A1) relations, both seem to have special importance for
an interdisciplinary theorization.


